Case 4105572/2017 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Kulikauskaite v Graham Rose And Pamela Rose T/A R & B Services CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 In accordance with the power set out in — 2018
- Case reference
- 4105572/2017
- Decision date
- 18 December 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ian McFatridge
Parties
2 namedKey findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe only material in the supplied PDF text is a certificate of correction issued by Employment Judge Ian McFatridge. It records that the judgment sent to the parties on 18 December 2018 contained clerical mistakes or omissions on page 2, line 2, and directs that the first 'Two' be replaced with 'One', the second 'Two' with 'Seven', and 'Seventy - ' be deleted.
The certificate states that an amended version of the judgment is attached, but the merits of the underlying claim, any liability findings, and any monetary award are not set out in the extracted text provided here. The notice also confirms that appeal or reconsideration time limits are unchanged and continue to run from the original judgment or from the date reasons were sent, if later.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The supplied text is a certificate of correction only. It corrects page 2, line 2 of the judgment sent to the parties on 18 December 2018 by replacing the first 'Two' with 'One', the second 'Two' with 'Seven', and deleting 'Seventy - '. No substantive claim outcome, liability finding, or award appears in the provided text. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.