Case 4105583/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Gahagan v Openreach Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 4105583/2023
- Decision date
- 16 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Murphy
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Gahagan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that the respondent dismissed the claimant for a potentially fair conduct reason, namely alleged health and safety breaches on 30 May 2023 involving failure to use a roller bar and failure properly to use or position a gas detection unit while working in an underground structure near a petrol station. The tribunal accepted that the dismissing officer had reasonable grounds for believing the claimant had committed the alleged misconduct.
The dismissal was nevertheless unfair because the respondent had not carried out a reasonable investigation and had not acted in a procedurally fair manner. The tribunal found that concerns raised by the claimant about the context of the site visit and the involvement of managers were not reasonably investigated, that the claimant was not given key written evidence in full during the disciplinary process, and that he was not sent the disciplinary invite letter which would have warned him that dismissal was a possible outcome.
For remedy, the tribunal found that the claimant had engaged in culpable conduct by failing to use the roller bar and by failing to ensure the gas detection unit remained properly positioned. It reduced the basic award by 90%. It also applied an 80% Polkey reduction to the compensatory award, then a further 90% reduction for contributory fault, producing a total award of £296.66.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the claimant complained of unfair dismissal and advanced no other complaints. Although the gov.uk listing category included disability discrimination, no discrimination complaint was adjudicated in the judgment. | Upheld | — | £297 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £297
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £203
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £94
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
25 references- s.94 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.98 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.98(2)(b) ERA 1996
- s.98(4) ERA 1996
- Abernethy v Mott Hay and Anderson
- Iceland Frozen Foods Limited v Jones
- British Home Stores v Burchell
- London Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Small
- The Post Office t/a Royal Mail v Gallagher
- Wilson v Racher
- Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust v Westwood
- Burdett v Aviva Employment Services Ltd
- Hadjioannou v Coral Casinos Ltd
- Procter v British Gypsum Ltd
- ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures
- Spink v Express Foods Group Ltd
- West Midlands Co-operative Society v Tipton
- Taylor v OCS Group Ltd
- Adeshina v St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
- s.122(2) ERA 1996
- Whelan v Richardson
- Polkey v AE Dayton Services Ltd
- s.123(6) ERA 1996
- Software 2000 Ltd v Andrews
- Pipecoil Technology Ltd v Heathcote
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.