Case 4105600/2016 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Morton v Maverick Valves BV — 2017
- Case reference
- 4105600/2016
- Decision date
- 18 September 2017
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Frances Eccles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Morton
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis Employment Tribunal judgment for case 4105600/2016, dated 18 September 2017, is a Rule 21 judgment signed by Employment Judge Frances Eccles. The extracted text records that the respondent, Maverick Valves BV, shall pay the claimant, Mr D Morton, expenses in the sum of £262.40.
The judgment text provided does not record any substantive determination of the underlying employment claims, nor does it set out findings on liability, dismissal, deductions from wages, or any other merits issue. On the face of the extracted judgment, the only operative order is for expenses.
No separate remedy breakdown is given beyond the expenses award, and no legal tests are cited in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment is a Rule 21 judgment and records only an order that the respondent pay the claimant expenses of £262.40. It does not state any substantive merits outcome for the underlying claim(s). | Other | — | £262 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £262
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.