Case 4105609/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Shopfitting Partners LLP — 2021
- Case reference
- 4105609/2020
- Decision date
- 7 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Whitcombe Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was presented to the claim, so the Employment Judge issued a Rule 21 judgment on the available material on 6 January 2021, entered in the register on 7 January 2021. The tribunal held that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £3,503.08 net.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £5,552.88. It further found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £1,076.92. The awards together total £10,132.88.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Notice pay breach of contract; damages ordered as a net amount. | Upheld | — | £3,503 |
| Redundancy | Tribunal found the dismissal was by reason of redundancy and awarded a statutory redundancy payment. | Upheld | — | £5,553 |
| Holiday pay | Holiday entitlement was found unpaid and the tribunal ordered payment of the sum stated. | Upheld | — | £1,077 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £10,133
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.