Case 4105617/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr B Gray v Windparkservice UK Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 4105617/2020
- Decision date
- 24 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge P Smith
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr B Gray
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge P Smith heard the case via CVP on 22 February 2021. The respondent did not appear and was not represented. The tribunal held that Windparkservice UK Limited had made unauthorised deductions from Mr B Gray's August 2020 wages and in respect of accrued holiday pay properly payable to him on termination of employment.
The judgment records that the claim succeeded as an unlawful deduction from wages claim. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant compensation in the net sum of £2,451.16. No separate breakdown of the award between wages and holiday pay is given in the written judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal declared unauthorised deductions from August 2020 wages and from accrued holiday pay due on termination. The judgment states the respondent was ordered to pay the claimant the net sum of £2,451.16. | Upheld | — | £2,451 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,451
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £2,451
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.