Case 4105620/2024 · Employment Tribunal
÷ EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4105620/2024 Mr C G Pirie v Meraki Bar and Restaurant Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 4105620/2024
- Decision date
- 23 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
Parties
2 namedClaimant
÷ EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4105620/2024 Mr C G Pirie
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was presented to the claim. An Employment Judge issued judgment on the available material under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal found that the respondent had unlawfully withheld the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £1,064 gross. It also ordered payment of £1,120 gross for accrued holiday pay and £634.62 as pay in lieu of notice.
The judgment permits the respondent to deduct any Income Tax and employee National Insurance Contributions required by law, provided those sums are remitted to HMRC and written evidence is given to the claimant. Payment of the balance would satisfy the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the respondent unlawfully withheld wages and orders payment of £1,064 gross, calculated as 76 hours at £14 per hour. | Upheld | — | £1,064 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment awards £1,120 gross for accrued holiday pay, calculated as 10 days x 8 hours x £14 per hour. | Upheld | — | £1,120 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment awards £634.62 as pay in lieu of notice, calculated as £33,000 divided by 52. | Upheld | — | £635 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,819
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.