Case 4105627/2024 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4105627/2024 Mr SJ Danton v Meraki Bar and Restaurant Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 4105627/2024
- Decision date
- 24 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4105627/2024 Mr SJ Danton
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was presented to the claim. An Employment Judge issued judgment on the available material under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant gross sums for an unauthorised deduction from wages, accrued holiday pay, and pay in lieu of notice. The respondent was permitted to deduct any required income tax and employee National Insurance contributions before paying the balance to the claimant, provided those deductions were remitted to HMRC and evidenced to the claimant.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, calculated as 161 hours at £10.42 per hour. | Upheld | — | £1,678 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal awarded accrued holiday pay, calculated as 102.7 hours at £10.42 per hour. | Upheld | — | £1,070 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal awarded pay in lieu of notice, calculated as one 40-hour week at £10.42 per hour. | Upheld | — | £417 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,165
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
- section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.