Case 4105629/2024 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4105629/2024 Miss R Hamer v Meraki Bar and Restaurant Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 4105629/2024
- Decision date
- 11 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4105629/2024 Miss R Hamer
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals Rules on the ground that it had not been actively pursued under rule 37(1)(d).
The reasons record that letters seeking further information were sent to the claimant on 27 August 2024 and 12 September 2024, followed by a reminder on 1 October 2024, with no reply received. A strike out warning letter was then sent on 14 October 2024 requiring a response by 28 October 2024, but the claimant did not respond, give reasons why judgment should not be made, or request a hearing.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment strikes out the claim for not being actively pursued. The specific pleaded heads are not described in the judgment text; this classification follows the listing category supplied for the case. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment strikes out the claim for not being actively pursued. The specific pleaded heads are not described in the judgment text; this classification follows the listing category supplied for the case. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment strikes out the claim for not being actively pursued. The specific pleaded heads are not described in the judgment text; this classification follows the listing category supplied for the case. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
- rule 37(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.