Case 4105654/2022 · Employment Tribunal
E.T. Z (WR) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4105654/2022 (P)5 Held at Aberdeen on June 2023 Employment Judge N M Hosie Miss N Manson v Represented by Mr J Godfrey,15 CAB Paul Mulvaney — 2023
- Case reference
- 4105654/2022
- Decision date
- 14 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hosie
- Venue
- Aberdeen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
E.T. Z (WR) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4105654/2022 (P)5 Held at Aberdeen on June 2023 Employment Judge N M Hosie Miss N Manson
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented on 18 October 2022 and the respondent lodged a response on 9 November 2022. A final hearing listed for 11 January 2023 was discharged because the respondent was unwell. A further hearing on 22 March 2023 was also discharged after the parties advised that settlement terms had been agreed and that the matter would be taken through ACAS.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The judgment records that this claim was settled by agreement; no merits findings were made. | Settled | — | — |
| Breach of contract | This refers to the claimant's notice claim. The judgment records settlement only and does not determine liability. | Settled | — | — |
| Other | Claim described in the judgment as the respondent's failure to provide a written statement of the claimant's terms and conditions of employment. The judgment records settlement only. | Settled | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,200
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.