Case 4105663/2022 · Employment Tribunal
E.T. Z (WR) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4105663/2022 (V)5 Held at Aberdeen on May 2023 Employment Judge N M Hosie Mrs R Dodge st v G and M Properties Scotland Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 4105663/2022
- Decision date
- 24 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge McManus. However
- Venue
- Aberdeen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
E.T. Z (WR) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4105663/2022 (V)5 Held at Aberdeen on May 2023 Employment Judge N M Hosie Mrs R Dodge st
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs R Dodge and Mr R Coombe brought claims of unlawful deduction of wages against G & M Properties Scotland Ltd. The respondent did not lodge an ET3 and did not appear at the final hearing on 15 May 2023, which was conducted by CVP. The tribunal accepted the claimants' evidence as measured, consistent and corroborative, and found it was supported by their calculation of wages statement and documentary productions, including wage slips.
The tribunal found that both claimants started work on 19 July 2022 as managers of the Waverley Inn, Dingwall and were also required to manage the nearby Royal Guest House. Although they had been told they would work around six hours a day, the tribunal found they actually worked about 96 hours per week, starting at 5am and often not finishing until around 11pm or later. It accepted that they had complained frequently to Robert Norris about the hours, and that on 23 August 2022 he wrote terminating their employment with effect from 1 September 2022.
On wages, the tribunal found that each claimant should have received £5,472 for the six weeks worked, calculated by reference to the then living wage of £9.50 per hour, but that each had only been paid £2,460.50. It therefore held that there had been an unlawful deduction of £3,011.50 from each claimant's wages and ordered that sum to be paid to each of them, subject to deduction of the appropriate amounts of income tax and national insurance.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | 1st claimant; the tribunal upheld the s.23 ERA 1996 claim and ordered £3,011.50 under deduction of income tax and national insurance. | Upheld | — | £3,012 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | 2nd claimant; the tribunal upheld the s.23 ERA 1996 claim and ordered £3,011.50 under deduction of income tax and national insurance. | Upheld | — | £3,012 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,023
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.