Case 4105680/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr William Hastie v Kirkland Refrigeration Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 4105680/2023
- Decision date
- 12 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge B Campbell
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr William Hastie
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting in Glasgow before Employment Judge B Campbell on 29 and 30 January 2024, held that Mr William Hastie had been unfairly dismissed by Kirkland Refrigeration Limited. He began work on 1 January 2021, was dismissed on 6 June 2023, was aged 29 at dismissal, worked 40 hours per week at £16 per hour, and had completed two years' service. The basic award was calculated using the statutory weekly pay cap of £643.
For compensation, the tribunal found that the relevant loss period ran from 4 July 2023 to 13 August 2023, the day before Mr Hastie started work for a new employer in a role that was at least as well paid. His net weekly pay was found to be £511. The tribunal reduced the basic and compensatory awards by 25% for contributory conduct, then increased them by 10% because the respondent had not followed the ACAS Code in disciplinary and grievance procedures. That produced a basic award of £1,056 and a compensatory award of £2,409, with the notice-pay period treated separately so that the claimant was not compensated twice.
The tribunal also upheld claims for unpaid wages, accrued annual leave, additional holiday pay, and notice pay. It found that £1,840.20 net was due for unpaid work since the payslip dated 19 May 2023, including 120 hours plus 16 overtime hours at £24. It awarded £614.40 for six days of accrued annual leave and £1,665.60 for holiday pay on overtime between 1 January 2022 and 6 June 2023, with no reduction or uplift applied to those holiday figures. It also awarded £2,248.40 as damages for four weeks' notice, calculated from a net equivalent of £2,044 and uplifted by 10%, with no contributory reduction applied to that head of loss. The total award ordered was £9,833.60.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed on 6 June 2023 after service from 1 January 2021; the tribunal awarded a basic award of £1,056 and a compensatory award of £2,409 after a 25% reduction for contributory conduct and a 10% uplift for failure to follow the ACAS Code. | Upheld | — | £3,465 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unpaid wages quantified from work done since the payslip dated 19 May 2023: 120 hours plus 16 overtime hours at £24, with a net award of £1,840.20. | Upheld | — | £1,840 |
| Holiday pay | Accrued annual leave: the tribunal found 14 days had accrued, 8 had been taken, leaving 6 days unpaid at £102.40 net per day. | Upheld | — | £614 |
| Holiday pay | Additional holiday pay on overtime between 1 January 2022 and 6 June 2023, calculated at £2,082 gross or £1,665.60 net. | Upheld | — | £1,666 |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay damages for the contractual four weeks' notice period; the tribunal used a net equivalent of £2,044 and applied a 10% uplift because the notice failure was closely related to the unfair dismissal and ACAS Code breach, without reducing for contributory conduct. | Upheld | — | £2,248 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £9,834
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £1,056
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £2,409
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.