Case 4105681/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Nelson v North Lanarkshire Council — 2024
- Case reference
- 4105681/2023
- Decision date
- 9 August 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Kearns
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Nelson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, a home support worker employed by North Lanarkshire Council, claimed that he had been underpaid throughout his employment in relation to overtime, non-core hours payments and designated user allowance. The tribunal identified the issue as whether the wages paid were less than the sums properly payable under the claimant's contract and the respondent's Schedule A terms.
On overtime, the tribunal found that the claimant worked variable weeks averaged to 28 contractual hours and that Schedule A required enhanced overtime rates only after hours exceeded 37 in an averaged week. The tribunal accepted the respondent's application of the rules, including the requirement that the claimant first work nine additional hours at basic rate before enhanced rates applied, and concluded that the claimant had been paid the sums properly payable under his contract.
On non-core hours payments, the tribunal found that the 15% enhancement applied to contractual hours only and not to overtime. The claimant accepted in cross-examination that he had been paid the contractual amount for non-core hours. On designated user allowance, the tribunal found that the allowance was a flat-rate payment for those meeting the mileage threshold, additional to the mileage allowance, and that the claimant had not shown that he was paid less than the contractual amount properly payable. The claims were dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim concerned alleged underpayment of overtime, non-core hours payments and designated user allowance. The tribunal dismissed all three heads of the unauthorised deductions claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.13 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.