Case 4105692/2023 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND)5 Case No: 4105692/2023 Hearing held in person in Edinburgh on – December 2024 Employment Judge - A Strain Members - Mrs N Quinn and Mr R Duguid Mrs J Gardner v Represented by: Mr A Watt - Solicitor ` WFS Ground Solutions Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 4105692/2023
- Decision date
- 30 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge A Strain Date
- Venue
- person in Edinburgh
- Panel members
- Mrs N Quinn, Mr R Duguid
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND)5 Case No: 4105692/2023 Hearing held in person in Edinburgh on – December 2024 Employment Judge - A Strain Members - Mrs N Quinn and Mr R Duguid Mrs J Gardner
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing held in person in Edinburgh on 2 to 5 December 2024, the tribunal comprising Employment Judge A Strain and members Mrs N Quinn and Mr R Duguid found that Mrs J Gardner was unfairly dismissed by WFS Ground Solutions Limited.
Oral reasons were given to the parties at the conclusion of the hearing. The parties informed the tribunal that remedy had been agreed, so the written judgment records liability only and does not set out any financial award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held that the claimant was unfairly dismissed. The parties informed the tribunal that remedy had been agreed, so the judgment records liability only. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.