Case 4105702/2012 · Employment Tribunal
Ms G Riley v Represented by: Unrepresented West Lothian Council — 2018
- Case reference
- 4105702/2012
- Decision date
- 27 February 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Laura Doherty
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms G Riley
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 12 January 2018, the tribunal gave Ms Riley an opportunity to provide written reasons by 19 January 2018, or to request a hearing, to explain why her claim should not be struck out. The judgment records that she did not do so.
The tribunal found that Ms Riley had failed to give an acceptable reason why judgment should not be made and had not requested a hearing. On that basis, it struck out the claim under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, on the ground that the claim had not been actively pursued within rule 37(1)(d).
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equal pay | The GOV.UK listing category is Equal Pay Act. The judgment itself records only that 'the claim' was struck out for non-active pursuit under rule 37(1)(d). | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37(1)(d)
- rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.