Case 4105710/2016 · Employment Tribunal
A Jones Mr S Cosgrove v Eco Refrigeration Limited — 2018
- Case reference
- 4105710/2016
- Decision date
- 31 July 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ms
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
A Jones Mr S Cosgrove
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr S Cosgrove, worked for Eco Refrigeration Limited as a refrigeration engineer. After an incident around 29 April 2016 in which he damaged the company van, he was dismissed, then re-employed after a meeting on 11 May 2016. The tribunal found that at that meeting he was told he could return if he paid £600 towards the repair costs, and that an agreement was reached for £200 to be deducted from each of his June, July and August wages.
A further incident on 22 September 2016 led to a summary dismissal. The respondent then deducted £600 from the claimant's final wages. The issue for the tribunal was whether the claimant had previously signified in writing his agreement or consent to the deduction within section 13(1) of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
The tribunal accepted the claimant as a credible witness and accepted his evidence about his re-employment. It noted that a document entitled "deductions from pay" appeared to be signed by the claimant, but that document related to an earlier contract of employment and could not be relied on for the later period of employment. A second undated document stated that Mr Cosgrove had agreed to pay back damage to the van and that a monthly amount had been arranged, but it did not specify that repayment would be made by deduction from wages.
Applying section 13(1) ERA 1996 and referring to Potter v Hunt Contracts [1992] ICR 337, the tribunal held that there was no written agreement authorising deduction of £600 from wages. It therefore found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction and ordered repayment of £600. The tribunal did not need to decide whether the claimant had in fact signed either document.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held that the respondent made an unauthorised deduction of £600 from the claimant's final wages in contravention of section 13 ERA 1996. | Upheld | — | £600 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £600
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 13(1) Employment Rights Act 1996
- Potter v Hunt Contracts [1992] ICR 337
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.