Case 4105757/2015 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4105757/2015 and others (per attached schedule) Mr D Allan and others v Cornerstone Community Care — 2017
- Case reference
- 4105757/2015
- Decision date
- 5 October 2017
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lucy Wiseman
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4105757/2015 and others (per attached schedule) Mr D Allan and others
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment concerns multiple claims by Mr D Allan and others against Cornerstone Community Care, listed in the attached multiple schedule.
The tribunal recorded that the claims had been withdrawn by the claimants. On that basis, Employment Judge Lucy Wiseman dismissed the claims under Rule 52 of the Rules in Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
No remedy or monetary award was made in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Working time regulations | The judgment records that the claims had been withdrawn by the claimants and were dismissed under Rule 52. The claim type is taken from the gov.uk listing category, as the judgment text itself does not describe the substantive working time issue. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.