Case 4105758/2016 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Andrew Hamilton v , Solicitor Morningside Masonic Association and others — 2019
- Case reference
- 4105758/2016
- Decision date
- 28 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge I McFatridge
- Venue
- Edinburgh
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Andrew Hamilton
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the preliminary hearing on employment status, Mr Andrew Hamilton said he had been unfairly dismissed and was owed arrears of salary, holiday pay and notice pay. The respondents said he was a volunteer and had never been an employee or worker. The tribunal therefore heard evidence only on status and related factual issues.
The tribunal found that Mr Hamilton had been Treasurer of the Morningside Masonic Association from about 2000 and also acted as Property Manager and premises manager. It accepted that he had received an honorarium of £250 in most years for his treasurer role, described as covering expenses, but found that the committee understood his work to be voluntary and were unaware of any monthly wage payments. The tribunal relied on the annual accounts, which it said were inconsistent with a payment of £500 per month, and rejected Mr Hamilton's explanation of how those figures could still be correct.
The tribunal also found that the versions of the minutes produced by Mr Hamilton for meetings on 15 May 2006 and 15 February 2010 had been altered, and accepted the respondents' versions as accurate. It did not make a finding that he had deliberately altered the documents, but it concluded on the balance of probabilities that the respondents' copies were the correct ones. It found Mr Hamilton not to be a credible or reliable witness, and preferred the evidence of the respondents' witnesses.
On those findings, the tribunal held that there had been no agreement between the parties and therefore no contract of employment. It also held that Mr Hamilton had not established that he was a worker providing services to the respondents. As he was neither an employee nor a worker, the case failed and the claim was dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed at the preliminary hearing after the tribunal found the claimant was neither an employee nor a worker. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The arrears of salary claim failed because the tribunal found no employment relationship and no worker status. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The holiday pay claim failed for the same reason: the claimant was found to be neither employee nor worker. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The reasons refer to notice pay as at the date of dismissal; that claim also failed once the tribunal found there was no contract of employment or worker relationship. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.