Case 4105769/2016 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4105769/2016 Mrs A Morawska v Patisserie Holdings plc — 2017
- Case reference
- 4105769/2016
- Decision date
- 11 May 2017
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Murdo MacLeod
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4105769/2016 Mrs A Morawska
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the claim had been withdrawn by the claimant. On that basis, the claim was dismissed under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
The extracted judgment does not set out the underlying facts, the legal basis of the claim, or any merits findings. It is therefore a procedural disposal only, with no remedy awarded and no substantive determination recorded in the text provided.
The judgment is dated 10 May 2017 and was entered in the register on 11 May 2017.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment states that the claim had been withdrawn by the claimant and was dismissed under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The substantive nature of the claim is not described in the extracted text. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.