Case 4105778/2016 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4105778/2016 Mr S Colcutt v Represented by: Mr A Rodgers Rail Gourmet UK Limited — 2017
- Case reference
- 4105778/2016
- Decision date
- 23 March 2017
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Murdo A.
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4105778/2016 Mr S Colcutt
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that Mr S Colcutt's claim against Rail Gourmet UK Limited was withdrawn by the claimant. Employment Judge Murdo A. MacLeod therefore dismissed the claim under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
The judgment does not set out any merits findings, liability determination, or monetary award. It records the date of judgment as 21 March 2017 and the date entered in the register and copied to the parties as 23 March 2017.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment states that the claim was withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The underlying claim type is not specified in the judgment text. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.