Case 4105782/2016 · Employment Tribunal
(sitting alone) Mr William McGilvary v Represented by: Himself Benaird Ltd — 2017
- Case reference
- 4105782/2016
- Decision date
- 23 March 2017
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge I McFatridge
- Venue
- Edinburgh
Parties
2 namedClaimant
(sitting alone) Mr William McGilvary
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant was employed as an electrician from 14 April 2016 on £26,500 per annum. After concerns were raised about workmanship on jobs including 65 Falcon Avenue and other properties, the respondents met him on 21 October 2016. The tribunal preferred Mr Walker's evidence that the claimant agreed to resign, so it found that he was not formally dismissed. It also noted that no whistleblowing claim had been made, despite the claimant referring to asbestos concerns during the evidence.
The notice pay claim failed because the tribunal found that the claimant resigned and was not dismissed. It added that, if it had found a dismissal, it would have concluded that the claimant was summarily dismissed for gross misconduct and therefore would not have been entitled to notice pay in any event.
The unlawful deduction claim succeeded. The tribunal held that clause 22 of the contract did not authorise the deductions actually made, because it applied where the employee owed money on termination, whereas here the respondents were owing wages to the claimant at the end of employment. The tribunal also found the respondents' evidence insufficient to justify the calculation of £161.92 said to relate to hours not worked, and insufficiently detailed as to the sums said to have been spent rectifying alleged defects. It referred to Yorkshire Maintenance Company Ltd v Farr on scrutiny of deduction clauses, but did not need to decide reasonableness because the deductions were not authorised on the contract wording.
The tribunal ordered payment of the net final wages due, which the parties agreed was £1,199.89. It made no award for tribunal fees because the claimant had full remission and had not paid any fee.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim under section 23 ERA 1996 for unpaid final wages after deductions said to cover defective workmanship, hours not worked, and holiday adjustments. | Upheld | — | £1,200 |
| Breach of contract | Claim for notice pay; the tribunal found the claimant resigned rather than being dismissed, and said that even if he had been dismissed it would have been summary dismissal for gross misconduct. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,200
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- Section 23 Employment Rights Act 1996
- Section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- Yorkshire Maintenance Company Ltd v Farr EAT0084/09
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.