Case 4105831/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L Brown v ’s Mother East Kilbride Football Club Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 4105831/2024
- Decision date
- 25 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Mackay
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr L Brown
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe hearing took place in Glasgow on 21 March 2025 before Employment Judge R Mackay. The tribunal gave oral reasons at the conclusion of the hearing and issued the written judgment on 25 March 2025. The claimant was Mr L Brown and the respondent was East Kilbride Football Club Ltd.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unlawful deductions from the claimant's wages. It ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £4,381, described in the judgment as the net sum to which the claimant was entitled. The judgment also states that the respondent is responsible for remitting to HMRC any income tax and national insurance payments due in respect of the gross amount.
The claimant's separate claim for reimbursement of medical expenses incurred by him was found not well founded and was dismissed. No further remedy was awarded in respect of that claim in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held that the respondent made unlawful deductions from the claimant's wages and awarded the net sum of £4,381. The judgment states that the respondent is responsible for remitting any income tax and national insurance due on the gross amount. | Upheld | — | £4,381 |
| Other | The claimant's claim for reimbursement of medical expenses incurred by him was held not well founded and dismissed. The extracted text does not specify a separate legal label for this claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,381
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.