Case 4105843/2022 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4105843/2022 Mr P Robertson v ARDS Ltd (In Liquidation) — 2023
- Case reference
- 4105843/2022
- Decision date
- 7 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge D Hoey Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4105843/2022 Mr P Robertson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 11 July 2023 the tribunal gave Mr P Robertson an opportunity to provide written reasons by 25 July 2023, or to request a hearing, to explain why the claim should not be struck out. The judgment records that he did not provide an acceptable reason and did not request a hearing.
The tribunal therefore struck out the claim under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, specifically on the ground that the claim had not been actively pursued under rule 37(1)(d). No substantive merits findings or remedy assessment were made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not specify the underlying head(s) of claim; it records that the claim was struck out under rule 37(1)(d) for not having been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.