Case 4105891/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Arlene L Simpson v Aberdeen Valet Services Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 4105891/2022
- Decision date
- 25 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge C McManus
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Arlene L Simpson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Mrs Arlene L Simpson had been dismissed by reason of redundancy by Aberdeen Valet Services Ltd. The hearing was held via Cloud Video Platform on 18 January 2023 before Employment Judge C McManus, sitting alone, and the claimant appeared in person while the respondent was represented by its director, Mr Stuart M Cooper.
The only monetary outcome recorded in the judgment was a statutory redundancy payment. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay Mrs Simpson £3,135 in respect of that payment. The reasons were given orally at the final hearing, and the written judgment records the award without setting out any additional legal issues or split of remedy components.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal held that the claimant had been dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a statutory redundancy payment of £3,135. | Upheld | — | £3,135 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,135
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.