Case 4105910/2022 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4105910/2022 Miss E Sharp v Newlands Care Angus Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 4105910/2022
- Decision date
- 15 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4105910/2022 Miss E Sharp
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 28 February 2023 the claimant was asked to provide a written statement of financial loss, but no suitable reply was received. On 21 April 2023 the tribunal issued a strike-out warning letter giving the claimant until 28 April 2023 to respond or request a hearing about the alleged non-compliance.
The claimant did not respond, did not give reasons why judgment should not be made, and did not request a hearing. The tribunal therefore struck out the claim under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, specifically rule 37(1)(c). The extract records no merits determination and no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The extract does not state the substantive claim label; this classification follows the case listing context. The judgment only records that the claim was struck out under rule 37(1)(c) for non-compliance with an order requiring a written statement of financial loss. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37
- rule 37(1)(c)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.