Case 4105916/2015 · Employment Tribunal
Ms I Divers v Represented by: Unrepresented South Lanarkshire Council — 2017
- Case reference
- 4105916/2015
- Decision date
- 12 June 2017
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Frances Eccles
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms I Divers
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 22 May 2017 the Tribunal gave Ms I Divers an opportunity to provide written reasons by 05 June 2017, or to request a hearing, to explain why the claim should not be struck out. The judgment records that she did not do so.
The Tribunal found that the claimant failed to give an acceptable reason why a judgment striking out the claim should not be made and did not request a hearing. It therefore held that the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claim was struck out under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, specifically rule 37(1)(d). The judgment records no substantive determination of the underlying claim and no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment text does not identify the underlying substantive claim type. It states only that the claim was struck out for not being actively pursued under rule 37(1)(d). | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37
- rule 37(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.