Case 4105930/2019 · Employment Tribunal
69(scot) claim dismissed on withdrawal rule EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4105930/2019 Ms M Logan v Represented by: Ian Gillan Dundee Voluntary Action — 2019
- Case reference
- 4105930/2019
- Decision date
- 11 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Alexander Kemp
Parties
2 namedClaimant
69(scot) claim dismissed on withdrawal rule EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4105930/2019 Ms M Logan
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs M Logan brought complaints under section 146 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 and under the Equality Act 2010 against Dundee Voluntary Action. The judgment records that both complaints had been withdrawn by the claimant.
Employment Judge Alexander Kemp therefore dismissed the complaints under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The judgment records no findings on the merits and no remedy award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade union | Complaint under section 146 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992; the judgment says it was withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed under Rule 52. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | Equality Act 2010 discrimination complaint; the extracted text does not specify the protected characteristic. The judgment says it was withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed under Rule 52. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.