Case 4105967/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss P Bowie v HMV Retail Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 4105967/2019
- Decision date
- 15 June 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge F Eccles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss P Bowie
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out Miss P Bowie’s claim against HMV Retail Limited under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 on the basis that the claim had not been actively pursued under rule 37(1)(d). The judgment is brief and does not identify the substantive pleaded cause or causes of action beyond the case listing context.
On 11 March 2020, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons by 18 March 2020, or to request a hearing so that the tribunal could consider why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant did not provide an acceptable reason and did not request a hearing.
Because no satisfactory response was received, the tribunal concluded that the claim should be struck out. No remedy or monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying pleaded claim type; it records only that the claim as a whole was struck out for not being actively pursued under rule 37(1)(d). | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37
- rule 37(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.