Case 4105969/2019 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4105969/2019 Mr J Campbell v Tesco Stores Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 4105969/2019
- Decision date
- 30 July 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Jane Porter
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4105969/2019 Mr J Campbell
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that the claimant withdrew the claim. It states that, following withdrawal, the claim was dismissed under Rule 52 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
The judgment does not set out factual findings on the underlying dispute, does not identify any remedy, and does not record any adjudication on the merits of the listed complaints.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the claim was withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed under Rule 52. The gov.uk listing included Unfair Dismissal, but the short judgment does not separately identify pleaded claims beyond referring to 'The claim'. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | The gov.uk listing included Right To Be Accompanied. The judgment itself does not specify this claim, but states that the claim was withdrawn and dismissed under Rule 52. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.