Case 4105979/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss J Spence v Respondent — 2023
- Case reference
- 4105979/2022
- Decision date
- 22 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Smith
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Miss J Spence
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss J Spence brought a claim against Teleperformance Limited for unauthorised deductions from wages. The Tribunal amended the respondent's name to Teleperformance Limited at the outset of the judgment.
The hearing took place via CVP in Glasgow on 20 March 2023 before Employment Judge Smith. The Claimant did not attend and was not represented; the Respondent attended and was represented by Miss S J Lundy, Senior HR and Employee Relations Specialist.
The Tribunal decided to proceed in the Claimant's unexplained absence under rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules 2013. Having done so, it dismissed the Claimant's claim of unauthorised deductions from wages.
The judgment records that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The Tribunal proceeded in the Claimant's unexplained absence under rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules 2013 and dismissed the claim of unauthorised deductions from wages. The judgment states that written reasons were not provided. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.