Case 4105979/2023 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4105979/2023 Miss J Spence v Teleperformance limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 4105979/2023
- Decision date
- 19 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge L Wiseman Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4105979/2023 Miss J Spence
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure on the ground that it had not been actively pursued under rule 37(1)(d).
The claimant failed to attend a CVP hearing on 26 September 2023. After a note issued on 29 September 2023, the claimant was given until 6 October 2023 to provide reasons for the failure to attend, but no further correspondence was received.
A strike out warning letter was issued on 10 October 2023 giving the claimant until 17 October 2023 to respond. The claimant did not respond, provide reasons why judgment should not be made, or request a hearing, and the Tribunal therefore struck out the claim.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The gov.uk listing categorised the case as Unlawful Deduction from Wages, but the judgment itself does not set out the substantive claim details; it records that the claim was struck out for not being actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The gov.uk listing categorised the case as Working Time Regulations, but the judgment itself does not set out the substantive claim details; it records that the claim was struck out for not being actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.