Case 4106033/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Gilly Naisby v Aerosurf Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 4106033/2019
- Decision date
- 27 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rory McPherson
- Venue
- Inverness
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Gilly Naisby
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal sat in Inverness on 21 November 2019 in case 4106033/2019 between Ms Gilly Naisby and Aerosurf Ltd. The judgment records that oral reasons were given at the hearing and states that the tribunal did not have jurisdiction to hear the claimant's claims.
The claims were dismissed on that jurisdictional basis. The extracted text contains no separate findings on the merits of any individual claim and no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment does not itemise the individual claim particulars; it states only that the tribunal did not have jurisdiction to hear the claimant's claims and dismissed them. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | The judgment does not itemise the individual claim particulars; it states only that the tribunal did not have jurisdiction to hear the claimant's claims and dismissed them. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment does not itemise the individual claim particulars; it states only that the tribunal did not have jurisdiction to hear the claimant's claims and dismissed them. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.