Case 4106035/2019 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4106035/2019 Mr G Richardson v L & I Eaton Arc (Edinburgh) Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 4106035/2019
- Decision date
- 20 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Jane Porter
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4106035/2019 Mr G Richardson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that Mr G Richardson's claim against L & I Eaton Arc (Edinburgh) Limited was withdrawn by the claimant. The tribunal therefore dismissed the claim under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
No substantive findings on liability were made and no remedy was awarded. The extracted text does not identify the specific underlying claim(s), beyond the case being listed under breach of contract, unfair dismissal and working time categories.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment records that the claim was withdrawn by the claimant and then dismissed under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The specific substantive claim type is not identified in the extracted text. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.