Case 4106038/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Auld v The Numbers Group — 2019
- Case reference
- 4106038/2019
- Decision date
- 11 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Kearns
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Auld
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that both claimants were engaged by CAD Leisure Ltd, not The Numbers Group LLP, which it found was dormant and used only as a trading name. It also noted that there was insufficient evidence to find a TUPE transfer to TNG 103 Ltd. The second claimant was found to have been a worker, and in the tribunal's terms an employee or worker of the second respondent, from 22 December 2018 to 28 March 2019 because she was required to provide personal service and had no right to send a substitute.
On the merits, the first claimant's case was treated as straightforward. He worked as head chef from 2 January 2019 to 28 March 2019 on an agreed salary of £25,000 per year. After deducting payments already made, the tribunal found £2,446.56 remained due and ordered payment of £2,447 as unlawfully deducted wages under section 13 ERA 1996.
The second claimant had agreed a salary of £49,400 per year as area manager for the hotels. The tribunal accepted her evidence that she was held out as working for The Numbers Group, but found the salary relationship was with CAD Leisure Ltd. It calculated unpaid salary of £6,125.02 after taking account of payments already received, and ordered £6,125 as unlawfully deducted wages under section 13 ERA 1996. The judgment also records that the claimants would account to HMRC for any unpaid tax and National Insurance as appropriate.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | First claimant. The tribunal held he was employed by CAD Leisure Ltd at the Kidron House Hotel and was owed arrears of pay for 2 January 2019 to 28 March 2019. It calculated gross pay due of £5,865.39, less payments received of £3,418.83, leaving £2,446.56, which was rounded to £2,447 in the judgment. | Upheld | — | £2,447 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Second claimant. The tribunal held she was at least a worker within s.230(3) ERA 1996, with a personal service obligation and no right of substitution, and that CAD Leisure Ltd was the contracting employer despite use of 'The Numbers Group' as a trading name. It calculated gross pay due of £13,300 less payments received of £7,174.98, leaving £6,125.02, which was rounded to £6,125 in the judgment. | Upheld | — | £6,125 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8,572
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.230(3) ERA 1996
- s.13 ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.