Case 4106040/2024 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4106040/2024 Miss N Grant v The Newport Restaurant — 2024
- Case reference
- 4106040/2024
- Decision date
- 18 October 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4106040/2024 Miss N Grant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment, issued because no response had been presented and the Employment Judge decided the claim on the available material. The claimant, Miss N Grant, succeeded on both matters recorded in the judgment: unlawful withholding of wages and unpaid holiday entitlement for the 2024 leave year.
For the wages claim, the tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £674.50 gross. The judgment states that this figure was calculated on the basis of 71 hours at £9.50 per hour.
For the holiday entitlement claim, the tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £94.05. That sum was calculated on the basis of 9.9 hours at £9.50 per hour. The judgment also allowed the respondent to deduct Income Tax and Employee National Insurance Contributions if required by law, provided the appropriate sums were remitted to HMRC and written evidence of the deductions was supplied to the claimant.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent had unlawfully withheld wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £674.50, calculated on 71 hours at £9.50 per hour. | Upheld | — | £675 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement for the 2024 leave year and ordered payment of £94.05, calculated on 9.9 hours at £9.50 per hour. | Upheld | — | £94 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £769
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.