Case 4106121/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Kennedy v Marlan Media — 2023
- Case reference
- 4106121/2022
- Decision date
- 1 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge L Wiseman
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Kennedy
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Kennedy began employment with Marlan Media on 22 August 2022 and was given a contract of employment. The contract stated a salary of £25,000 per annum, although he was told that figure had been included in error and that the salary was in fact £28,000 per annum. The contract also provided for 40 days' holiday plus 8 statutory days, with the holiday year running from January to December.
The claimant was due to be paid at the end of August 2022 but received nothing. He raised the issue with the respondent and was told payment would be made, but no payment followed. He then gave one week's notice on 22 September 2022 and left on 29 September 2022. By the end of his employment he had not been paid any wages, holiday pay, or pay for the notice period. The respondent did not enter a response.
The tribunal accepted the claimant's evidence and found the claims well founded. It concluded that wages had been unlawfully deducted, that holiday pay was due, and that the claimant had not been paid for the notice period. The operative judgment awarded £2,154 gross for unpaid wages, £538.46 gross for holiday pay, and £538.46 gross for notice.
In the reasons, paragraph 14 refers to £21,545 for unpaid wages, but the same paragraph says this was calculated as £538.46 multiplied by 4 weeks. That figure is inconsistent with the dispositive order of £2,154 gross and appears to be a typographical error. The judgment does not record any separate legal tests or any panel members beyond Employment Judge L Wiseman.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The dispositive order awards £2,154 gross. The reasons at paragraph 14 refer to £21,545, but the stated calculation is £538.46 x 4 weeks, which indicates a typographical error. | Upheld | — | £2,154 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal awarded £538.46 gross in respect of holiday pay, described in the reasons as 5 days' holiday. | Upheld | — | £538 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal ordered payment of £538.46 gross in respect of the notice period. | Upheld | — | £538 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,231
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.