Case 4106162/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs C Duncan v Greenstar Insulation Ltd — 2018
- Case reference
- 4106162/2018
- Decision date
- 31 July 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge F Jane Garvie
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs C Duncan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which Employment Judge F Jane Garvie found that Mrs C Duncan had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. The respondent, Greenstar Insulation Ltd, was ordered to pay damages of £1,537.84, calculated by reference to a weekly pay figure of £384.46.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy. On that basis, it held that she was entitled to a redundancy payment of £2,306.76, calculated from 4 years' service, age 47, and gross weekly pay of £384.46, derived from an annual salary figure of £19,992 divided by 52. The combined monetary award shown by the two heads is £3,844.60.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment states the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awards damages of £1,537.84, calculated by reference to weekly pay of £384.46. | Upheld | — | £1,538 |
| Redundancy | The judgment states the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and is entitled to a redundancy payment of £2,306.76, based on 4 years' service, age 47, and gross weekly pay of £384.46. | Upheld | — | £2,307 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,845
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.