Case 4106239/2022 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4106239/2022 Mr M Biernat v Osteria — 2023
- Case reference
- 4106239/2022
- Decision date
- 31 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Kearns Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4106239/2022 Mr M Biernat
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment issued on the available material because no response had been presented to the claim. The claimant was Mr M Biernat and the respondent was Osteria. Employment Judge M Kearns determined the matter on 27 January 2023, with the judgment entered in the register on 31 January 2023.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant’s wages. It ordered Osteria to pay Mr Biernat £1,680 in respect of that claim.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement. It ordered Osteria to pay Mr Biernat £1,518 in respect of holiday pay. The judgment records no other claims, no separate remedy analysis, and no reference to interest or additional awards.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,680 |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,518 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,198
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.