Case 4106290/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Christine Brown v The Management Committee of — 2023
- Case reference
- 4106290/2022
- Decision date
- 24 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge I McPherson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Christine Brown
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningRespondents did not lodge an ET3 or attend, so the case proceeded undefended. The tribunal accepted the claimant's evidence on the essential facts, found that her employment with Leithland Neighbourhood Centre began on or about 3 July 2006 and ended on 29 September 2022, and held that the centre closed and her post was made redundant. On that basis it awarded a redundancy payment of £7,416 under s.135 and s.139 ERA 1996.
On unfair dismissal, the tribunal found no fair reason for dismissal, no consultation, no redundancy procedure, no effort to find alternative work, and no right of appeal. It calculated a basic award of £7,416 on the claimant's age and 16 years' service, but that award was reduced to nil under s.122(4) ERA 1996 because a redundancy payment was also ordered. The compensatory award was £2,957.27, made up of £2,457.27 for nine weeks' past loss of net earnings between 29 September and 1 December 2022 and £500 for loss of statutory rights. The tribunal recorded Jobseekers' Allowance of £319 and a prescribed element of £2,457.27 for recoupment purposes, and noted that the claimant had no future loss because her new job paid more than her former role.
It also found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract as to notice and awarded £819.09, reflecting three weeks' net pay after avoiding double recovery with the unfair dismissal award. The pleaded unlawful deduction from wages claim was not proved to the extent claimed: the reasons discuss uncertainty about the final payslip and the amount allegedly short-paid, and no award was made for the £615 alleged deduction or for any separate sum for 23 to 29 September 2022. On holiday pay, the tribunal used the 2022 annual leave card and a pro-rata calculation to 29 September 2022 to find 41.2 hours untaken leave and awarded £374.92 under Regulation 30 of the Working Time Regulations 1998. The total ordered was £11,567.28.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The claimant was aged 62 with 16 years' continuous service. The tribunal found a redundancy situation when the centre closed on 29 September 2022 and ordered a redundancy payment of £7,416, calculated as 24 weeks' pay at £309 per week. | Upheld | — | £7,416 |
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found no fair reason for dismissal, no consultation, no redundancy procedure, no attempt to find alternative employment, and no right of appeal. The basic award would have been £7,416 but was reduced to nil under s.122(4) ERA 1996 because a redundancy payment was also awarded. The compensatory award of £2,957.27 comprised £2,457.27 for nine weeks' past loss of net earnings between 29 September and 1 December 2022 plus £500 for loss of statutory rights; Jobseekers' Allowance of £319 was recorded for recoupment purposes. | Upheld | — | £2,957 |
| Breach of contract | The notice claim succeeded. The tribunal treated 12 weeks as the statutory notice period for 16 years' service, but awarded only the additional 3 weeks not already covered by the unfair dismissal loss, giving £819.09 net. | Upheld | — | £819 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal considered alleged arrears and a claimed £615 shortfall, but the amount was not established. The reasons record uncertainty about the final payslip and no separate award was made for 23 to 29 September 2022. Because the reasoning is internally mixed, the outcome is recorded as other rather than as a clean dismissal or upholding. | Other | — | — |
| Holiday pay |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £11,567
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £0
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £2,957
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
13 references- s.135 ERA 1996
- s.139 ERA 1996
- s.155 ERA 1996
- s.162 ERA 1996
- s.163 ERA 1996
- s.118 ERA 1996
- s.119 ERA 1996
- s.122(4) ERA 1996
- s.123 ERA 1996
- s.86 ERA 1996
- s.13 ERA 1996
- Regulation 30 Working Time Regulations 1998
- Employment Protection (Recoupment of Benefits) Regulations 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.