Case 4106361/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs S Cannon v Represented by: Mr M Cannon – Husband South Lanarkshire Council — 2023
- Case reference
- 4106361/2022
- Decision date
- 17 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge S MacLean
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs S Cannon
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs S Cannon brought a claim of disability discrimination by association arising from the respondent's handling of special leave after her son was diagnosed with a life-threatening illness in August 2021. The respondent accepted that the claimant's son was a disabled person for the purposes of section 6 of the Equality Act 2010. This hearing was limited to whether the claim had been presented in time under section 123 of the Equality Act 2010.
The tribunal found that the act complained of was the fieldwork manager's decision not to exercise discretion to extend special leave beyond the six-week period. On the basis of that act, a timely claim should have been presented by 3 January 2022, so the claim was out of time. The tribunal rejected the argument that there had been conduct extending over a period: it considered the decision to be a one-off act, and did not treat the later grievance process as a reconsideration or review of that decision.
The tribunal then considered whether it was just and equitable to extend time. It accepted that the claimant had sought advice from her trade union representative, was guided towards the grievance process, engaged in ACAS early conciliation, and understood that her representative or the union solicitors might deal with the claim. It also took into account the claimant's stress and anxiety, her ongoing caring responsibilities, and the absence of evidence that the delay had affected the cogency of the evidence or caused material prejudice to the respondent. It therefore allowed the claim to proceed. The judgment states that the findings were limited to the preliminary issue and did not bind any future tribunal dealing with the merits.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Preliminary time-limit ruling only; the tribunal decided the disability discrimination complaint could proceed because it was just and equitable to extend time. The merits of the discrimination claim were not determined. | Upheld | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- s.123 Equality Act 2010 just and equitable extension
- British Coal Corporation v Keeble factors
- s.140B Equality Act 2010
- s.18A Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.