Case 4106371/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Marie MacKenzie v Wyndford Farm Plants Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 4106371/2023
- Decision date
- 12 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rory McPherson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Marie MacKenzie
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe hearing took place via CVP in Edinburgh on 11 January 2024 before Employment Judge Rory McPherson. Ms Marie MacKenzie appeared in person and Wyndford Farm Plants Ltd was represented by Ms P Lillington, Director.
The extracted judgment text records only the final outcome: the claimant's complaints were dismissed. Oral reasons were given at the final hearing, but the supplied text does not include those reasons or identify the individual complaint findings in detail.
No monetary award is recorded in the extracted text, and no separate remedy calculation is provided. The judgment is a short disposal decision only.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The extracted judgment text does not specify the individual complaint types; this claim type is taken from the gov.uk listing category supplied in the case context. The judgment states only that the claimant's complaints were dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The extracted judgment text does not specify the individual complaint types; this claim type is taken from the gov.uk listing category supplied in the case context. The judgment states only that the claimant's complaints were dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.