Case 4106373/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Serco Ferries (Guernsey) Crewing Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 4106373/2023
- Decision date
- 30 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 3 December 2024, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons by 10 December 2024 or to request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant did not give an acceptable reason and did not request a hearing.
The tribunal therefore struck out the claim under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013, on the ground that it had not been actively pursued within rule 37(1)(d). The extracted judgment records no substantive findings on liability and no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment strikes out the claim under rule 37(1)(d) for not being actively pursued. The extracted text does not separately set out the underlying pleaded allegation, but the case listing identifies disability discrimination as one of the case categories. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment strikes out the claim under rule 37(1)(d) for not being actively pursued. The extracted text does not separately discuss the underlying unfair dismissal allegation, but the case listing identifies unfair dismissal as a case category. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37
- rule 37(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.