Case 4106375/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Employment tribunal upholds unlawful-deduction-from-wages claim against Chedstow (Falkirk) Limited
The respondent, Chedstow (Falkirk) Limited, was not present or represented. The tribunal’s judgment was that the respondent made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant’s wages.
- Case reference
- 4106375/2023
- Decision date
- 29 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sangster
- Venue
- Edinburgh
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Darrell Oag
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing in Edinburgh by CVP on 11 January 2024, Employment Judge Sangster determined the case on the papers and oral hearing record. The respondent, Chedstow (Falkirk) Limited, was not present or represented. The tribunal’s judgment was that the respondent made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant’s wages.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held that the respondent made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of £1,458.80 gross, made up of August 2023 wages (£1,239.98) and holiday pay (£218.82). | Upheld | — | £1,459 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,459
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.