Case 4106380/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Sandra Faulds & others v Represented by: Mr P Kissen - Solicitor Moorburn Manor Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 4106380/2023
- Decision date
- 29 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge L Doherty
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Sandra Faulds & others
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that the respondents were in breach of their obligations under section 188(1B)(b) and section 188A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. The judgment records that the claimants were represented by Mr P Kissen, solicitor, and that there was no appearance or representation for the respondent.
The tribunal ordered that a protective award be made in respect of the claimants named in the schedule attached to the judgment who were dismissed as redundant. The protected period was stated to begin on 17 July 2023 and to last for 90 days. Reasons were given orally at the hearing, so the written judgment contains only the operative findings and order.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Protective award under sections 188(1B)(b) and 188A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. The judgment states the respondents were in breach of those obligations and that a protective award would be made for the claimants named in the attached schedule who were dismissed as redundant. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.188(1B)(b) TULRCA 1992
- s.188A TULRCA 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.