Case 4106402/2024 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4106402/2024 Miss A Straszak v George IV Bar — 2024
- Case reference
- 4106402/2024
- Decision date
- 2 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4106402/2024 Miss A Straszak
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out Miss A Straszak's claim against George IV Bar under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The judgment states that the strike out was made on two grounds: non-compliance with a Tribunal order under rule 37(1)(c) and that the claim had not been actively pursued under rule 37(1)(d).
In the reasons, the Tribunal recorded that on 24 October, 14 November, and 15 November 2024 it advised the claimant to re-send copies of pay slips and any other additional documents needed to progress the case. The letter of 24 October 2024 warned that failure to comply with the Tribunal's orders could result in the claim being struck out.
The claimant did not provide the requested documents. The Tribunal therefore concluded that the claimant had failed to comply with its order and had failed actively to pursue the claim, and it struck the claim out. The judgment was issued by Employment Judge M A Macleod on 29 November 2024 and entered in the register on 2 December 2024.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying substantive claim in the extracted text; it only states that the claim was struck out under rule 37. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37(1)(c) Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- rule 37(1)(d) Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.