Case 4106407/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Higgins White House Products Limited v Represented by: Mr W McParland - Solicitor — 2019
- Case reference
- 4106407/2019
- Decision date
- 17 July 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Gall
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Higgins White House Products Limited
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the preliminary hearing on 11 July 2019, the claimant confirmed through Mr McParland that the section 20 Equality Act 2010 claim for failure to make reasonable adjustments was withdrawn. The tribunal recorded that withdrawal in its judgment and treated the claim as falling to be dismissed under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Claim for failure to make reasonable adjustments under section 20 Equality Act 2010. At the preliminary hearing on 11 July 2019, claimant's solicitor confirmed it was withdrawn; the tribunal then issued judgment dismissing that part of the claim following withdrawal under Rule 52. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution & Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
- Rule 51 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution & Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.