Case 4106410/2019 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Nos: 4106410/2019 & 4120672/18 Miss N de Wilde v Represented by: Mr P Lefevre - Quantum Claims Baker Hughes Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 4106410/2019
- Decision date
- 1 July 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Nicol
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Nos: 4106410/2019 & 4120672/18 Miss N de Wilde
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment states that the claims in case numbers 4106410/2019 and 4120672/18 had been withdrawn by the claimant. Employment Judge Nicol Hosie therefore dismissed the claims under Rule 52 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
No substantive liability findings, remedy assessment, or monetary award are recorded in the judgment. The text does not identify the underlying claim types, and it contains no further reasoning beyond the fact of withdrawal and dismissal under Rule 52.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Case number 4106410/2019. The judgment does not identify the underlying claim type; it records that the claim was withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed under Rule 52. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | Case number 4120672/18. The judgment does not identify the underlying claim type; it records that the claim was withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed under Rule 52. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.