Case 4106414/2024 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4106414/2024 Mr S Cassidy v Cygnet Resources Ltd (In Liquidation) — 2024
- Case reference
- 4106414/2024
- Decision date
- 23 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4106414/2024 Mr S Cassidy
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal issued a Rule 21 judgment because no response had been presented to the claim and the decision was made on the available material. The respondent, Cygnet Resources Ltd (In Liquidation), was ordered to pay Mr S Cassidy £5,280 gross as pay in lieu of notice, calculated at 11 weeks at £480 per week.
The tribunal also ordered payment of £7,920 gross as a redundancy payment, calculated at 16.5 weeks at £480 per week. The hearing listed for 17 October 2024 was cancelled. The judgment also recorded that the respondent could deduct income tax and employee National Insurance contributions if required by law and, if deducted and remitted to HMRC with written confirmation, payment of the balance would satisfy the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Rule 21 judgment awarding pay in lieu of notice of £5,280, calculated as 11 weeks at £480 per week. | Upheld | — | £5,280 |
| Redundancy | Rule 21 judgment awarding a redundancy payment of £7,920, calculated as 16.5 weeks at £480 per week. | Upheld | — | £7,920 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £13,200
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.