Ms R Martin v Triangle Under s — 2020

Case reference: 4106416/2019
Decision date: 29 March 2020
Jurisdiction: Scotland
Judge: Employment Judge A Strain

Indexed: 22 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Ms R Martin

Respondent

Triangle Under s

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

At an open preliminary hearing held by CVP on 28 March 2022, Employment Judge A Strain dealt with the claimant's case against Triangle Under 5s. The judgment records that the claim was struck out only in part, namely insofar as it sought damages for breach of contract relating to legal costs incurred by Ms R Martin for representation before the SSSC at hearings on 22 April, 21 May and 5 July 2019.

The tribunal's operative order was a strike-out under Rule 37(1)(a) of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. No other claim outcomes, liability findings, or monetary awards are set out in the text provided, and the judgment notes that oral reasons were given at the conclusion of the hearing.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Breach of contract	The tribunal struck out the claim only so far as it related to damages for breach of contract in respect of legal costs incurred by the claimant for representation before the SSSC at hearings on 22 April, 21 May and 5 July 2019.	Struck out	—	—

Legal tests applied

1 reference

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.