Case 4106417/2019 · Employment Tribunal

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4106417/2019 Miss L McKay v Represented by: D Denny, Solicitor Debenhams Retail Limited nd — 2019

Case reference: 4106417/2019
Decision date: 12 September 2019
Jurisdiction: Scotland
Judge: Employment Judge J Porter Date

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4106417/2019 Miss L McKay

Respondent

Represented by: D Denny, Solicitor Debenhams Retail Limited nd

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

This short judgment records that the claim against the 1st respondents only was withdrawn by the claimant. The tribunal therefore dismissed that claim under Rule 52 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.

No substantive liability findings or remedy award are recorded in the extracted text. The judgment is limited to the procedural dismissal following withdrawal, and it does not set out the underlying factual issues or determine the merits of any claim in the text provided.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Other	The judgment states that the claim against the 1st respondents only had been withdrawn by the claimant and was dismissed under Rule 52. It does not specify the substantive claim type in the extracted text.	Dismissed	—	—

Legal tests applied

1 reference

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.