Case 4106418/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v N & C Pubs Ltd (in liquidation) — 2020
- Case reference
- 4106418/2019
- Decision date
- 4 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge A Kemp
- Venue
- Dundee
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Douglas Neave worked for N & C Pubs Limited from 10 December 2014 as a kitchen porter at Nicholls Bar and Restaurant in Dundee. On 26 January 2019 he mistakenly believed he was on holiday and did not attend work; on 8 February 2019 he returned and was told he had been dismissed for gross misconduct. The tribunal found that the dismissal letter referred to earlier warnings that he had not previously seen, that no disciplinary hearing was held before dismissal, and that his appeal by letter dated 13 February 2019 was not answered and no appeal hearing took place.
The respondent did not enter a Response Form and did not appear at the final hearing. The tribunal held that the respondent had not established the reason for dismissal, so the dismissal was unfair. It added that, even if the reason had been conduct arising from the failure to report for work on 26 January 2019, the dismissal would still have been unfair because the process was procedurally defective and materially breached the ACAS Code of Practice.
For remedy, the tribunal accepted that Mr Neave had mitigated his loss by seeking work and found that his net earnings were about £180 per week. It awarded a basic award of £1,080 and a compensatory award of £9,360, calculated on one year of lost earnings from dismissal to the hearing date, giving a total monetary award of £10,440. Because the claimant had received benefits, the recoupment regulations applied: the prescribed element was £9,360 and the non-recoupable balance was £1,080. The tribunal noted that a financial penalty under section 12A of the Employment Tribunals Act 1996 would ordinarily have been considered in light of the ACAS breach, but none was imposed because the respondent was in liquidation.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal awarded a basic award of £1,080 and a compensatory award of £9,360, making a monetary award of £10,440. The Employment Protection (Recoupment of Benefits) Regulations 1996 applied. | Upheld | — | £10,440 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £10,440
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £1,080
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £9,360
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
7 references- s.98(1) and (2) ERA 1996
- s.98(4) ERA 1996
- BHS v Burchell
- Iceland Frozen Foods Ltd v Jones
- Polkey v AE Dayton Services
- West Midlands Co-operative Society Ltd v Tipton
- ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.